Normally questions are questions. Nothing special. But… questions about watches, yes, that is a different story. To the point, what is that ring into the watch of blau? It looks not that bad. So i think JLC did it to make the Geophysic 1958 more a tool wa
This is a picture of a Geophysic 1958 with the caseback off. Do you see that black perforated ring between the movement and the case? What is it? I'd think "it's just a spacer ring filling the difference in size between the movement and case" but I've nev
the Geophysic 1958 instead. I kid, of course - it’s a lovely watch. I just wish JLC would revive this line as complement to the Polaris (instead of rolling all of their “sporty” watches under that line). That said I understand sales struggled enough to ki
The Tribute to Geophysic 1958 in steel and the 2016 Memovox Boutique Edition, whose dial looks very much like the Snowdrop (what a cool name for a watch!)
[the next level of depth would be to list initial calibers and all subsequent caliber iterations for each model, of course with year of caliber change] Inaugural year of production of watch models: Rolex: Oyster Perpetual 1931 Explorer 1953 Submariner 195
We can all agree: The black enamel and rose gold combination are timeless, beautiful and desirable whilst the Year of the Tiger verso engraving/enamel will have limited appeal. Where does this leave us? We must wonder about the goal of current maison lead
Hmmm.... I’ve been going through a bit of a Patek phase recently. So the number one watch that gets heaps of wrist time would be the 5960p followed by the 3940r. Apart from those two my De Bethune DB25 in wg/40mm is also back in the rotation (God I miss t
With Nicolas' help, mayhaps we can convince JLC to produce a purist edition watch like this... I would be the first to commit to buying one, and would love to see them numbered as well. Since it is my idea, maybe I could reserve number 1 of X, if X watche